Residency programs are an essential part of graduate medical education (GME), providing newly graduated physicians with hands-on, supervised training in their chosen specialties. These programs prepare doctors for independent practice while addressing the healthcare needs of diverse populations. However, funding residencies is a complex process involving federal and private sources, as well as significant financial considerations for hospitals. Understanding the costs associated with residency training and the sources of funding is crucial, especially as the United States faces a growing physician shortage. 

Medical residents are physicians who have completed medical school and are undergoing specialized training at hospitals or clinics. Residency programs typically last three to seven years, depending on the specialty. There are approximately 140,000 active medical residents in the United States annually. Residents receive salaries averaging $63,000 per year, which increase incrementally as they progress through their training. Beyond salaries, residency programs incur additional costs for supervision, administrative support, and educational resources. The total cost per resident often exceeds $100,000 annually when factoring in these additional expenses. 

Most funding for residencies comes from federal sources, with Medicare being the largest contributor. Medicare provides over $100,000 per residency position to hospitals to cover salaries and other program expenses. Approximately 86% of residency funding is federally sourced, supplemented by state budgets and private entities such as philanthropic organizations. Medicaid and Veterans Affairs programs also contribute to residency funding, albeit to a lesser extent. State-level initiatives have become increasingly important in addressing physician shortages in underserved areas. For example, some states have allocated millions of dollars to expand residencies in rural regions or areas with limited access to healthcare services. These targeted investments aim to improve access to care in communities that need it most. 

Private funding sources also play a role in supporting residencies. Hospitals generate revenue from patient care provided by residents, although residents themselves do not directly bill patients for their services. Instead, all patient billing revenue goes to the hospital, which uses it to subsidize residency programs. While residents are often seen as cost-effective compared to hospitalists or mid-level practitioners (MLPs), there are hidden costs associated with their training. Non-compensation costs for residents—such as administrative expenses—can range from $1,500 to $9,417 per resident annually. Despite these costs, studies have shown that resident teams can reduce per-patient direct costs and shorten lengths of stay compared to hospitalist-MLP teams. This highlights how residents contribute significantly to hospital efficiency and patient care quality. 

Expanding residency positions is critical for addressing the looming physician shortage in the United States. An aging population and retiring physicians are expected to exacerbate this shortage in the coming years. Increased funding for residencies can play a pivotal role in expanding the number of training spots available without compromising program quality. Federal and state governments have already begun addressing this issue through targeted investments aimed at increasing residency positions in underserved areas. For instance, some states have used budget allocations and grant incentives to grow their residency programs strategically.

Aligning funding with outcomes—such as retention rates of physicians in underserved areas—can further maximize the impact of increased investments. Approximately 55% of physicians remain in the state where they complete their residency training, underscoring the importance of strategic funding allocations that prioritize areas with critical healthcare needs. By expanding residency spots and ensuring sustainable funding sources, policymakers can help mitigate physician shortages while improving healthcare access nationwide.

Residency programs are vital for training the next generation of physicians while ensuring healthcare delivery across diverse settings. Funding these programs involves substantial federal support supplemented by state and private contributions. Although residents are more cost-effective than hospitalists in many cases, hospitals still face significant financial burdens due to hidden costs such as supervision and administrative expenses. Increased funding for residency spots is crucial not only for addressing physician shortages but also for expanding access to care across underserved regions.

References

1. Chen C, Petterson S, Phillips RL Jr., Mullan F, Bazemore A, O’Donnell SD. Toward graduate medical education (GME) accountability: Measuring the outcomes of GME institutions. Acad Med. 2013;88(9):1267-1280. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a3ce9
2. Iglehart JK. Medicare, graduate medical education, and new policy directions. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(6):643-650. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr0803754 
3. Sargen M, Hooker RS, Cooper RA. Gaps in the supply of physicians, advance practice nurses, and physician assistants: The role of GME reform. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(6):991-999.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.005 
4. Grover A, Orlowski JM, Erikson CE. The nation’s physician workforce and future challenges: A blueprint for ensuring alignment with population needs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(8):1334-1341. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2015.10.009